THE FIRST MAN TO SEPARATE RELIGION AND POLITICS | MACHIAVELLI POLITICAL THOUGHT | THE PRINCE

#machiavelli #theprincefamily

THE FIRST MAN WHO SEPARATED RELIGION AND POLITICS | MACHIAVELLI POLITICAL THOUGHT #politics #machiavelli #top10 #africa Nicholas Machiavelli's Thoughts about religion and Politics!
The prince, Book of Machiavelli.

The first man to differentiate religion and politics.
Machiavelli has had a dreadful reputation throughout his life. To be "Machiavellian" in cunning means to be completely untrustworthy. Machiavel is a classic villain in European play who is often mistaken for Satan. Old Nick is, in fact, Old Niccolo—Niccolo Machiavelli, Secretary of State and diplomat for the Florentine government from 1469 to 1527, author of the Discourses on Livy, a History of Florence, and that famous short essay The Prince, among other works.
The Prince, is the basis of Machiavelli's terrible reputation, and it is the only one of his novels that has ever been widely read; yet, of all his books, it is the one that provides the least sure hint to the workings of his mind. There are as many theories as there are scholars about the true meaning of The Prince, leader, or ruler. But one thing that all experts agree on is that the real Machiavelli is not the terrible person but popular legend, no matter how horrible his effect was. It is sufficient to read the Discourses and the History of Florence, the texts to which he himself paid the most value, to see this.

Many politicians appear to be dishonest. This should not be the case, and we should remember and read Niccol Machiavelli's works.
Late 15th century political advisor and political theorist who argued that politicians are not immoral but simply bad at lying, dissembling, and maneuvering.
A good politician, according to Machiavelli, is not one who is friendly, honest, and kind; rather, they are someone who knows how to defend the rich and bring honor to the state, which is also extremely important.
Being nice is a virtue in general, but what citizens most need from their rulers is effectiveness, which may necessitate the use of these darker arts. Once we understand this fundamental requirement, we will be less disappointed and clearer about what we expect from our politicians.
Machiavelli was a 16th century Florentine philosopher known primarily for his political ideas. His two most famous philosophical books, The Prince and the Discourses on Livy, were published after his death.
His father was a boy and so received an extensive formal education and got his first job as a secretary for the city of Florence but soon after his appointment Florence exploded politically expelled the Medici family who ruled it for 60 years and suffered decades of instability.
In turn as a consequence of Machiavelli experienced a series of career reverses over just a few decades he went from being important diplomat to a semi successful general to an enemy of the state, tortured and exiled and maybe she returned what's wrong bullet issue can be remembered as a truly great because of two works he wrote the Prince and the disperse it tends to a central problem of politics then as now that it's almost impossible to be good politician.
Machiavelli proposed that the overwhelming responsibility of a good Prince is to defend the state from external and internal threats to stable governance, this means he must know how to fight but more importantly he must know about reputation and the management of those around him.
People should neither think it's often easy to disobey nor should they find him so cruel that he disgusts his society should seem unapproachable strict with reasonable.
When Machiavelli turned to the question of whether it was better for a Prince to be loved or feared he wrote that while theoretically and wonderful for a leader to play out both, Machiavelli believed that, for a ruler, it was better to be widely feared than to be greatly loved; a loved ruler retains authority by obligation, while a feared leader rules by fear of punishment and for him If you can’t be both. Choose to be feared than to be loved.
People are divided on whether Machiavelli was a Christian of the time or a pagan of that time, based on what he wrote in his book. Most people believe that Christians of the time should not be tempted to write things according to the rules that were in place at the time. For us, we could wonder what Machiavelli's philosophy on religion, specifically Christianity, was. What does the famous man who published the book a thousand years ago, but whose philosophy is being practiced today think about religion, notably Christianity?